DT
IB Design Technology
SL · Lesson 56 · Materials, Selection and Sustainable Systems Synthesis
01 / 17
Lesson 56 · Unit 7

Materials, Selection &
Sustainable Systems

Use material evidence to make design decisions—then test those decisions against sustainability and circular-economy strategies.

80 minutesA3.1 · B3.1 · C2.1 · C2.2
Guiding question: Why is “this material is strong and recyclable” still an incomplete material-selection argument?01
Today’s destination

By the end of class, you should be able to…

01

Classify accurately

Use origin, property classes and structural forms correctly.

02

Recall key properties

Distinguish physical, chemical and mechanical terms.

03

Select with evidence

Include aesthetics, cost, availability, sustainability and research.

04

Think in systems

Apply sustainable-design and circular-economy strategies.

Success check: Use accurate terminology, then apply it to unfamiliar design contexts.
SYNTHESIS · Product + context02

By property type

Physical, chemical and mechanical properties organize how materials behave.

By source / origin

Natural and human-made material families: timbers, polymers, metals, glass, textiles, composites, smart materials and biomaterials.

By structural form

The guide’s A3.1.2 also names frame, shell, solid and combination structures—how material is arranged in a product.

A3.1.1–3.1.2 · classification03
Physical

Density

Mass per unit volume.

Physical

Thermal expansion

Dimensional change with temperature.

Physical

Thermal conductivity

Ability to conduct heat.

Physical

Melting point

Temperature where solid changes to liquid.

Physical

Electrical resistivity

Opposition to electrical current.

Physical

Electrical conductivity

Ability to conduct electrical current.

A3.1.4 · six physical properties04

Corrosion resistance

Ability to resist chemical/electrochemical degradation.

Reactivity / food safe

How readily the material chemically interacts; suitability for food-contact contexts matters.

Hygroscopy

Tendency to absorb moisture from the environment.

Flammability

Ease with which a material ignites/burns.

A3.1.5 · four chemical properties05

Loads / resistance

tensile strengthcompressive strengthstiffnesstoughnesshardness

Shaping / deformation

malleabilityductilityplasticity

Recovery

elasticity

Do not use “strong” as a substitute for the property actually required.

A3.1.6 · nine mechanical properties06
Which property best describes resistance to permanent indentation or scratching?
Which property describes returning toward original shape after a force is removed?
A3.1 · discriminate similar terms07

Composite

Two or more materials are combined to create a property set more suitable for the purpose/context.

Smart material

A property changes significantly in response to an environmental stimulus.

Biodegradable / biomaterial

Can break down after useful life; important to circular strategies when designed into an appropriate system.

A3.1.7–3.1.908
Smart

Piezoelectricity

Mechanical stress ↔ electrical response.

Smart

Shape memory

Returns toward a programmed shape under stimulus.

Smart

Photochromicity

Changes optical appearance with light.

Smart

Magneto-rheostatic

Flow/viscosity changes with magnetic field.

Smart

Electro-rheostatic

Flow/viscosity changes with electric field.

Smart

Thermoelectricity

Temperature difference and electrical energy are linked.

A3.1.8 · six named responses09

Properties

Physical + chemical + mechanical fit.

Aesthetics

Texture, form, colour and finishing techniques.

Context

Cost, availability and sustainability.

Research

Justify choices using appropriate primary + secondary evidence.

B3.1.1–3.1.4 · justify selection10

Reusable school water bottle

Needs low mass, impact resistance, safe food contact, repeated washing, pleasant grip and reasonable cost.

Why is “use stainless steel because it is strong” incomplete?
It does not identify the relevant mechanical property, ignores mass/thermal behaviour/corrosion or food-contact context, and omits aesthetics, cost, availability, sustainability and research evidence. A selection argument must match multiple requirements and trade-offs.
B3.1 · evidence-based selection11
Datchefski

Five principles

cyclicsolarsafeefficientsocial
Issues

Design decisions

wastepollutionenergy consumption
TBL

People · profit · planet

conflictcompromiseprioritization
C2.1 · sustainability strategy12

Design out waste

Longevity, upgradability, disassembly, dematerialization.

Use better loops

Biodegradable materials where appropriate.

Recover value

Take-back, reuse, repair, recondition, recycling.

Power the loop

Renewable energy such as solar, wind, hydro or other renewable sources.

C2.2 · closed-loop design13
Linear approachCircular-economy approach
Extract → make → use → disposeKeep products/components/materials in use through closed loops.
End-of-life often treated as wasteEnd-of-use becomes a recovery, reuse, repair or recycling opportunity.
Value is lost at disposalDesign tries to preserve material/product value.
C2.2.1 · compare and contrast14

A product uses very little energy during use but is permanently bonded and impossible to repair.

Can it be sustainable but weak for circularity?
Yes. Sustainability can involve multiple people/profit/planet trade-offs, while circularity specifically emphasizes closed loops, longevity, disassembly, recovery and eliminating waste/pollution. One positive feature does not guarantee circularity.
C2.1 vs C2.2 · distinguish strategies15

Redesign a replaceable bicycle-light housing.

Build a four-part material argument.
1) Identify relevant properties for weather, impact, mass and heat; 2) consider texture/form/colour/finish; 3) compare cost, availability and sustainability; 4) justify with research and circular choices such as disassembly/repair/recovery.
A3.1 + B3.1 + C2.1 + C2.216
Exit ticket

Before you leave…

1. Name one property you still confuse with another and write the contrast.
2. Give one non-property factor in material selection.
3. Explain one difference between sustainable design and circular-economy design.
Next lesson

Product Analysis & Design Evaluation — Synthesis

Keep the retrieval loop moving: recall → apply → check → correct → revisit.

Curriculum alignment
Cumulative synthesis of A3.1, B3.1, C2.1 and C2.2: material classifications and all required physical/chemical/mechanical properties; structural forms named in A3.1.2; composites, smart and biodegradable materials; aesthetics/cost/availability/sustainability/research-based selection; Datchefski principles, TBL and circular-economy strategies.
Lesson complete17 slides
Designed by David Xu · © 2026 David Xu. All rights reserved.Educators and students are welcome to use these materials for non-commercial teaching and learning with attribution. Please share the original link when possible. Reposting, redistributing modified copies, removing attribution, or commercial use requires prior permission.
IB Design Technology SL · Lesson 5617