Rapid Prototyping &
CAD Overview
Turn CAD geometry into fast physical feedback using additive processes—and understand the trade-offs among common techniques.
By the end of class, you should be able to…
Explain rapid prototyping
Describe why fast physical prototypes accelerate design development.
Compare SLA/FDM/SLS
Describe advantages and disadvantages of three common rapid-prototyping techniques.
Connect CAD to manufacture
Explain why CAD geometry must be suitable for the chosen process.
Choose a process
Select a technique based on form, fidelity, material/process limits and testing needs.
CAD → physical prototype → feedback → revised CAD.
Create / revise geometry
Build a physical version quickly
Users + team test and refine
FDM builds parts by depositing molten filament layer by layer.
Material extrusion
Common desktop route to fast, affordable prototypes.
SLA cures liquid photopolymer resin with light.
Photopolymerization
Thin cured layers can produce fine detail and smooth surfaces.
SLS fuses powder selectively to create each layer.
Powder-bed process
Unfused powder can support complex geometry during the build.
No process is universally “best.”
| FDM | SLA | SLS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical strength | Accessible + fast | Fine detail + smooth finish | Complex functional geometry |
| Support issue | Often needs supports | Often needs supports | Powder self-supports much geometry |
| Surface | Layer lines visible | Usually smooth | Often grainier |
| Classroom accessibility | Often highest | Moderate / handling considerations | Usually specialized |
Choose the process
A team needs a small ergonomic control prototype with fine tactile ridges and smooth curved surfaces for user evaluation. Structural load is low.
Which process is the strongest fit from the three?
A beautiful CAD model can still fail as a rapid prototype.
Too thin?
Features may break or fail to form.
Needs support?
Orientation affects support and finish.
Parts fit?
Clearance must account for process accuracy.
Closed / valid?
Models need suitable solid geometry for reliable slicing/build preparation.
More cycles can improve the evidence base.
Fit test
Discover interference / reach problem.
User handling
Adjust radius, grip, control location.
Integrated test
Check final geometry against multiple specifications.
Choose FDM, SLA or SLS for each brief.
Large quick enclosure
Low cost, next-day form/fit check.
Miniature detailed knob
Fine texture and smooth curves for appearance/handling.
Complex nested duct
Internal geometry difficult to support conventionally.
Rapid prototyping vocabulary
Retrieve first. Then check.
Can you retrieve it without looking back?
Before you leave…
IA Day 8 — Generate Full Range of Redesign Ideas
Keep the evidence chain moving: user → research → decision → test.
A2.2.6 SLA/FDM/SLS advantages and disadvantages · B2.2.5 CAD models suitable for rapid prototyping.